I’m reading Charles Eisenstein’s “The More Beautiful World Our Hearts Know Is Possible.” I was drawn to it’s title that is similar to a phrase I use a lot – that our brief is to “design a world we would love to live in”. Though it’s a little long on new-age polemic, it contains thought-provoking insights into a different way of being. It points to what it might take to achieve this ideal state – culturally, intellectually and spiritually. It only hints at how it might come to be designed
I wrote this piece as a margin note to a chapter titled “Scarcity”. Eisenstein relates the poverty of architectural quality in American suburbia to the many ways in which feelings of scarcity are embedded in our culture. ”Scarcity of attention. Scarcity of play. Scarcity of listening. Scarcity of dark and quiet. Scarcity of beauty.” He argues that we insert faux expressions of intimacy in places that we yearn for but are unable to get connection. For example, pornography is a substitute for emotional and physical intimacy that we need but find elusive. The former he calls “ugliness”, the latter “beauty”.
He poses this question, “How much of the ugly does it take to substitute for a lack of the beautiful?” I wrote:



